Datalab Marker v2 vs MinerU, Docling, and Liteparse: Benchmark Breakdown
Article summary
Quick briefing — cleaned from the original RSS feed
Datalab rewrote Marker as a three-mode pipeline. Version 2 hits 76.0 on olmOCR-bench and sustains 2.9 pages per second on one B200 — over 5× MinerU's pipeline backend, while beating Docling on both accuracy and speed. Here's how it compares against MinerU, Docling and LiteParse, and which one fits your use case.
1Key Takeaways
- Datalab rewrote Marker as a three-mode pipeline.
- Version 2 hits 76.0 on olmOCR-bench and sustains 2.9 pages per second on one B200 — over 5× MinerU's pipeline backend, while beating Docling on both accuracy and speed.
- Here's how it compares against MinerU, Docling and LiteParse, and which one fits your use case.
2AIWedia Score
7.8/10
Solid update — useful context for the AI space
Based on source trust, recency, category impact, and story depth.
3Why it matters
Video AI is reshaping ads, social content, and entertainment with faster generation pipelines. MarkTechPost Video reports that datalab rewrote Marker as a three-mode pipeline.
Explore related
Browse toolsVideo AI news
Explore curated video ai tools on AIWedia — compare, rank, and launch from our directory.
Full story on MarkTechPost Video
Read full articleHeadlines aggregated via RSS for discovery on AIWedia. Original content © MarkTechPost Video. We link to the source and do not republish full articles.