GitHub Copilot Refuses Harmful Requests in Chat, Then Writes Them in Code
Article summary
Quick briefing — cleaned from the original RSS feed
An AI coding assistant that refuses to answer a dangerous request in its chat box can answer it anyway if the same request is broken into small, ordinary-looking steps inside a code editor. That is the finding of a new study of GitHub Copilot by researchers Abhishek Kumar and Carsten Maple. The models they tested through Copilot, Claude from Anthropic, and Gemini from Google, refused
1Key Takeaways
- An AI coding assistant that refuses to answer a dangerous request in its chat box can answer it anyway if the same request is broken into small, ordinary-looking steps inside a code editor.
- That is the finding of a new study of GitHub Copilot by researchers Abhishek Kumar and Carsten Maple.
- The models they tested through Copilot, Claude from Anthropic, and Gemini from Google, refused.
2AIWedia Score
8.6/10
High relevance — worth your attention today
Based on source trust, recency, category impact, and story depth.
3Why it matters
New model releases change what is possible for builders, researchers, and everyday AI users. The Hacker News reports that an AI coding assistant that refuses to answer a dangerous request in its chat box can answer it anyway if the same request is broken into small, ordinary-looking steps inside a code editor.
Explore related
Browse toolsRelated tools
AI Models news
Explore curated ai models tools on AIWedia — compare, rank, and launch from our directory.
Full story on The Hacker News
Read full articleHeadlines aggregated via RSS for discovery on AIWedia. Original content © The Hacker News. We link to the source and do not republish full articles.