Human in the loop is not a switch: classify the commands
Article summary
Quick briefing — cleaned from the original RSS feed
Human in the loop is usually implemented as a switch: approvals on, or approvals off. Both settings are wrong for an agent that runs shell commands, and you find that out the same way everyone does, which is by watching a long task die on its third ls . The stall looks like this. Your agent is working through something multi-step, it needs to look at a directory, the harness raises an approval, and the run stops dead waiting for a human who has gone to make coffee. Multiply that by forty tool…
1Key Takeaways
- Human in the loop is usually implemented as a switch: approvals on, or approvals off.
- Both settings are wrong for an agent that runs shell commands, and you find that out the same way everyone does, which is by watching a long task die on its third ls .
- Your agent is working through something multi-step, it needs to look at a directory, the harness raises an approval, and the run stops dead waiting for a human who has gone to make coffee.
2AIWedia Score
8.1/10
High relevance — worth your attention today
Based on source trust, recency, category impact, and story depth.
3Why it matters
Coding AI shifts how fast software ships and how much human review each change needs. DEV — AI reports that human in the loop is usually implemented as a switch: approvals on, or approvals off.
Explore related
Browse toolsCoding AI news
Explore curated coding ai tools on AIWedia — compare, rank, and launch from our directory.
Full story on DEV — AI
Read full articleHeadlines aggregated via RSS for discovery on AIWedia. Original content © DEV — AI. We link to the source and do not republish full articles.