I Tested DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi and GLM for a Month - Real Results
Article summary
Quick briefing — cleaned from the original RSS feed
I Tested DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi and GLM for a Month - Real Results honestly, I never thought I'd be writing about chinese AI models. Like, a year ago I was paying OpenAI $10/M output tokens and feeling good about it. Then I started poking around at what these chinese labs were shipping and... well, lets just say my cloud bill looks very different now. heres the deal: DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi, and GLM are basically the four horsemen of china's AI scene right now. Each one comes from a different lab,…
1Key Takeaways
- I Tested DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi and GLM for a Month - Real Results honestly, I never thought I'd be writing about chinese AI models.
- Like, a year ago I was paying OpenAI $10/M output tokens and feeling good about it.
- Then I started poking around at what these chinese labs were shipping and...
- well, lets just say my cloud bill looks very different now.
2AIWedia Score
8.4/10
High relevance — worth your attention today
Based on source trust, recency, category impact, and story depth.
3Why it matters
Coding AI shifts how fast software ships and how much human review each change needs. DEV — AI reports that i Tested DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi and GLM for a Month - Real Results honestly, I never thought I'd be writing about chinese AI models.
Explore related
Browse toolsCoding AI news
Explore curated coding ai tools on AIWedia — compare, rank, and launch from our directory.
Full story on DEV — AI
Read full articleHeadlines aggregated via RSS for discovery on AIWedia. Original content © DEV — AI. We link to the source and do not republish full articles.