LLM Inference Latency: Why Your 7B Model Gets 15 tok/s on a T4 but 3,500 tok/s on an H100
Article summary
Quick briefing — cleaned from the original RSS feed
`NVIDIA's spec sheet says the H100 delivers 989 TFLOPS of FP16 compute. The A100: 312. The T4: 65. Simple arithmetic says the H100 is 15× faster. So a 7-billion-parameter LLM should be 15× faster on an H100, right? It's 150× faster. The T4 struggles at ~15 tok/s . The H100 cruises at ~2,200 tok/s — and with continuous batching, north of 3,500 . The 15× TFLOPS gap doesn't explain the 150× throughput gap. The missing variable is the one thing NVIDIA's marketing pages bury on line three of the…
1Key Takeaways
- `NVIDIA's spec sheet says the H100 delivers 989 TFLOPS of FP16 compute.
- Simple arithmetic says the H100 is 15× faster.
- So a 7-billion-parameter LLM should be 15× faster on an H100, right?
- The H100 cruises at ~2,200 tok/s — and with continuous batching, north of 3,500 .
2AIWedia Score
8.4/10
High relevance — worth your attention today
Based on source trust, recency, category impact, and story depth.
3Why it matters
Coding AI shifts how fast software ships and how much human review each change needs. DEV — ML reports that `NVIDIA's spec sheet says the H100 delivers 989 TFLOPS of FP16 compute.
Explore related
Browse toolsCoding AI news
Explore curated coding ai tools on AIWedia — compare, rank, and launch from our directory.
Full story on DEV — ML
Read full articleHeadlines aggregated via RSS for discovery on AIWedia. Original content © DEV — ML. We link to the source and do not republish full articles.