Would You Pay $1 for Agentic Code Review on PRs?
Article summary
Quick briefing — cleaned from the original RSS feed
It might surprise people that I'm investing time in LLM tooling -- "Agentic" tooling even -- because I've always been somewhat of an AI-skeptic. But, this code-review project is not my first foray into the category; I am also working on a task runner called camas that optionally includes an MCP and skills, and indeed it was used for the development of code-review . In turn, camas now benefits from code-reviews 's agentic review on every PR. Perhaps I am more of an "AI-industry" skeptic, or wary…
1Key Takeaways
- It might surprise people that I'm investing time in LLM tooling -- "Agentic" tooling even -- because I've always been somewhat of an AI-skeptic.
- But, this code-review project is not my first foray into the category; I am also working on a task runner called camas that optionally includes an MCP and skills, and indeed it was used for the development of code-review .
- In turn, camas now benefits from code-reviews 's agentic review on every PR.
- Perhaps I am more of an "AI-industry" skeptic, or wary….
2AIWedia Score
8.6/10
High relevance — worth your attention today
Based on source trust, recency, category impact, and story depth.
3Why it matters
Coding AI shifts how fast software ships and how much human review each change needs. DEV — AI reports that it might surprise people that I'm investing time in LLM tooling -- "Agentic" tooling even -- because I've always been somewhat of an AI-skeptic.
Explore related
Browse toolsCoding AI news
Explore curated coding ai tools on AIWedia — compare, rank, and launch from our directory.
Full story on DEV — AI
Read full articleHeadlines aggregated via RSS for discovery on AIWedia. Original content © DEV — AI. We link to the source and do not republish full articles.